My impressions after a couple weeks: Input and ToDo structure

Thank you for the constructive feedback, much appreciated. Regarding the keyboard bug, we’ll respond to that one in the other topic you created (thanks for that!).

On the desktop version, input of the different types of entries ie Title, List types etc. are cumbersome to invoke. The “little circle” on the left of a line is not always present and is “fickle” in its invocation. The right button fly-out menu is cumbersome to use in a normal typist’s flow. We really need keyboard shortcuts!

Perhaps you hadn’t seen them yet, but we have a full set of keyboard shortcuts, I’ve copied the ones regarding editing below:

Shortcut Command
⌃⌘ 0 Body Text
⌃⌘ 1 Heading
⌃⌘ 2 Sub-Heading
⌃⌘ 3 Minor Heading
⌃⌘ 4 Minor Sub-Heading
⌃⌘ 5 Preformatted
⌃⌘ 0 Body Text
⌃⌘ 0 Body Text
⇧⌘ - Bullet List
⇧⌘ I Numbered List
⇧⌘ C Checklist
⌃⌘ C Mark as Checked / Unchecked
⌘ ] Increase Indentation
⌘ [ Decrease Indentation
⌘ B Bold
⌘ I Italic
⌘ U Underline
⌘ L Fixed Width
⇧⌘ X Strikethrough
⌃⌘+ Superscript
⌃⌘- Subscript

A more MD markup approach to entering lines and assigning them attributes for those who prefer that (like me) would be really nice.

That too is already there, see this How to topic:

One such ToDo structure I use in my planning is a Topic of an item (as a note?) associated with the greater project scope. It feels like Agenda is “missing a layer” of organizational structure?

You can build these structures yourself using Agenda links (and optionally pinned notes) if you want, in the Talk section I have given a few examples. Tags in combination with smart overviews are another way to create these kind of top level overviews.

Have a look to some of the techniques used in the examples here:

Or this suggestion:

Finally, indeed more powerful checklist options as well as the ability to create smart overviews of unchecked list items for example is indeed on our roadmap